Skip to main content
Download PDF

Gender-specific relationship between thigh muscle and fat mass and brain amyloid-β positivity

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy volume 14, Article number: 145 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The relationship of specific body composition in the thighs and brain amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition remained unclear, although there were growing evidence that higher muscle and fat mass in thighs had a protective effect against cardiometabolic syndromes. To determine whether muscle mass and fat mass in the thighs affected amyloid-beta (Aβ) positivity differently in relation to gender, we investigated the association of muscle mass and fat mass with Aβ positivity using positron emission tomography (PET) in individuals without dementia.

Methods

We recruited 240 participants (134 [55.8%] males, 106 [44.2%] females) without dementia ≥45 years of age who underwent Aβ PET, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans of the hip in the health promotion center at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea. Lower extremity skeletal muscle mass index (LASMI) was measured using BIA, and gluteofemoral fat percentage (GFFP) was estimated using DEXA scans of the hip. We investigated the associations of LASMI and GFFP with Aβ positivity using logistic regression analyses after controlling for age, APOE4 genotype, and cognitive stage.

Results

Higher muscle mass in the thighs, measured as LASMI (odds ratio [OR]=0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08 to 0.84, p=0.031) was associated with a lesser risk of Aβ positivity in only females. Higher fat mass in the thighs, measured as GFFP (OR=0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.95, p=0.008) was associated with a lesser risk of Aβ positivity in only males. However, the association between LAMSI (p for interaction= 0.810), GFFP (p for interaction= 0.075) and Aβ positivity did not significantly differ by gender. Furthermore, LAMSI only negatively correlated with centiloid (CL) values in females (r=−0.205, p=0.037), and GFFP only negatively correlated with CL values only in males (r=−0.253, p=0.004).

Conclusions

Our findings highlight the importance of recognizing that gender differences exist with respect to the specific body composition to potentially protect against Aβ deposition. Therefore, our results may help in designing gender-specific strategies for controlling body composition to prevent Aβ deposition.

Background

Deposition of amyloid-beta (Aβ) is the most prominent pathological change in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). According to many studies on in-vivo Aβ biomarkers, brain Aβ deposition precedes brain atrophy and cognitive impairment. Cognitively normal participants with Aβ biomarkers are reported to be more likely to develop mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia than those without Aβ biomarkers [1,2,3]. Thus, Aβ positivity is an important predictor of AD dementia prognosis.

Growing body of evidence shows that weight loss is associated with a higher risk of AD [4, 5]. Weight loss is also reported to be the early sign of AD [6]. Furthermore, there were several studies investigating the associations of BMI or weight loss with Aβ deposition [7, 8]. However, since BMI reflects nonspecific measures of body composition, previous studies using BMI were not able to investigate which body components (ie, muscle mass and fat mass) might be associated with a higher risk of Aβ deposition.

Previous studies have suggested that thigh circumference may be an important determinant of cardiometabolic syndrome [9] and mortality [10]. Both increased fat and muscle mass in the thighs, which reflect for a large composition of human body [11, 12], have protective effects against cardiometabolic syndrome [13, 14]. Specifically, higher fat mass in the thighs was found to be associated with a better metabolic marker status including higher adiponectin levels, lower insulin resistance, lower cholesterol levels, and lower C-reactive protein levels [15,16,17,18]. Higher thigh fat mass also prevents cardiometabolic syndrome, including hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia [19, 20]. In contrast, progressive loss of muscle mass in the thighs with aging, which is known as sarcopenia [21], is associated with a greater risk of cardiovascular disease [22, 23]. In addition, there is increasing evidence that lower muscle mass is related to metabolic impairment and poor health outcomes, including increased morbidity and mortality rates [24, 25]. Considering that cardiometabolic syndromes are closely associated with the development of AD, it would be reasonable to expect that decreased fat and muscle mass of the thighs might be associated with increased risk of Aβ deposition in individuals without dementia. Furthermore, previous studies have revealed differences in body composition between males and females. In fact, it was found that fat mass was lower and muscle mass was higher in males than in females [14]. Therefore, it is possible that Aβ deposition in males might be vulnerable to decreased fat mass, while Aβ deposition in females might be vulnerable to decreased muscle mass.

The objective of our study was to investigate the association of muscle mass in the thighs, as measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and fat mass in the thighs, as measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the lower body, with Aβ positivity using positron emission tomography (PET) in individuals without dementia. Specifically, we determined whether fat and muscle mass in the thighs affected Aβ positivity differently between males and females.

Methods

Study Participants

We enrolled 240 participants without dementia ≥45 years of age who underwent a full health screening examination, including BIA and DXA scans of the hip in the health promotion center at Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between August 2015 and October 2020. All patients also underwent standardized neuropsychological test battery using the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery 2nd edition (SNSB-II) [26, 27], blood tests, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and Aβ PET. Participants without dementia were participants with normal cognition (NC) and those with MCI. All participants with NC met the following criteria: (1) no medical history that was likely to affect cognitive function based on Christensen's health screening criteria [28]; (2) no objective cognitive impairment in any cognitive domain on a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery (above at least -1.0 SD of age-adjusted norms on any cognitive test); and (3) independence in activities of daily living. All patients with MCI met the criteria for MCI with the following modifications [29, 30]: (1) subjective cognitive complaints by the participants or caregivers; (2) objective memory impairment below -1·0 SD on verbal or visual memory tests, (3) no significant impairment in activities of daily living, and (4) non-demented status.

We excluded participants with significant whiter matter hyperintensities (cap or band >10 mm and longest diameter of deep white matter lesion > 25 mm), structural lesions including cerebral infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, brain tumors, and hydrocephalus on MRI, and abnormal laboratory results on complete blood count, electrolyte, vitamin B12 and folate levels, syphilis serology, and liver/kidney/thyroid function tests.

All participants underwent BIA and DXA scans of the hip on the same day, and these measurements were performed within three years before or after the Aβ PET. The median time interval between the measures was 4 months (interquartile range, 2–7 months). Two hundreds and twelve (88.3%) out of 240 participants had less than 12-month interval between BIA and DXA scans and Aβ PET.

The institutional review board of the Samsung Medical Center approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Aβ PET acquisition

All participants underwent Aβ PET (18F-florbetaben PET and 18F-flutemetamol PET scans using a Discovery STe PET/CT scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). For 18F-florbetaben PET or 18F-flutemetamol PET, a 20-minute emission PET scan in dynamic mode (consisting of 4 × 5 min frames) was performed 90 min after an injection of a mean dose of 311.5 MBq 18F-florbetaben or 197.7 MBq 18F-flutemetamol, respectively. Three-dimensional PET images were reconstructed in a 128 × 128 × 48 matrix with 2 mm × 2 mm × 3·27 mm voxel size using the ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm (18F-florbetaben, iteration = 4 and subset = 20; 18F-flutemetamol, iteration = 4 and subset = 20).

Aβ PET quantification using centiloid values

We used a centiloid (CL) method previously developed by our group [31] to standardize the quantification of Aβ PET images obtained using different ligands. The CL method for FBB and FMM PET enables the transformation of the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of FBB and FMM PETs to CL values directly without conversion to the 11C-labeled Pittsburgh compound SUVR.

There are three steps to obtain CL values [31]: (1) pre-processing of PET images, (2) determination of CL global cortical target volume of interest (CTX VOI), and (3) conversion of SUVR to CL values. First, to pre-process the Aβ PET images, PET images were co-registered to each participant’s MR image and then normalized to a T1-weighted MNI-152 template using the SPM8 unified segmentation method. We used T1-weighted MR image correction with the N3 algorithm only for intensity nonuniformities, without applying corrections to the PET images for brain atrophy or partial volume effects. Second, we used the FBB-FMM CTX VOI defined as areas of AD-specific brain Aβ deposition in our previous study [31]. Briefly, to exclude areas of aging-related brain Aβ deposition, the FBB-FMM CTX VOI was generated by comparing SUVR parametric images (with the whole cerebellum as a reference area) between 20 typical patients with Alzheimer’s disease-related cognitive impairment (AD-CTX) and 16 healthy elderly participants (EH-CTX) who underwent both FBB and FMM PET scans. To generate the FBB-FMM CTX VOI, the average EH-CTX image was subtracted from the average AD-CTX image. We then defined the FBB-FMM CTX VOI as areas of AD-related brain Aβ accumulation common to both FBB and FMM PET. Finally, the SUVR values of the FBB-FMM CTX VOI were converted to CL units using the CL conversion equation. The CL equation was derived from the FBB-FMM CTX VOI separately for FBB and FMM PET and applied to the FBB and FMM SUVR.

To determine the participants’ CL cut-off-based Aβ positivity, we applied the optimal cut-off value derived using a k-means cluster analysis in 527 independent samples of participants with normal cognition. The cut-off value was set at 27.08, representing the 95th percentile of the lower cluster [32], and the whole cerebellum was used as a reference region.

Thigh muscle mass measurement

To obtain body mass index (BMI) and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) of the bilateral lower limbs, all participants underwent BIA using a multifrequency BIA device (InBody 720; InBody Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines [33]. The appendicular skeletal muscle mass index in the lower extremity (LASMI) was calculated by dividing the sum of the ASM in the bilateral lower limbs by the square of the height (ASM in bilateral lower extremity/[height]2). According to previous results that LASMI was highly correlated with thigh muscle volume in MRI scans of thigh [34], we considered LASMI as a proxy marker of muscle mass in the thigh.

Thigh fat mass measurement

All participants underwent DXA scans using Lunar Prodigy Advance (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. DXA scans are widely used diagnostic tools for osteoporosis and are recommended in the elderly. The left side was scanned routinely, and for participants with left hip fracture or device, the right side was scanned. The boundaries of the regions of interest (ROIs) for determining regional body composition were automatically defined using the software provided by the manufacturer (software version: enCORE version 18.0). We selected the gluteofemoral region as the ROI, and the fat percentage of the soft tissue in the gluteofemoral region included in the hip scans was extracted from the scanner databases. We considered the gluteofemoral fat percentage (GFFP) as a proxy marker of fat mass in the thigh.

Standardized neuropsychological test battery

All participants underwent the SNSB-II [26, 27], which includes standardized and validated tests of various cognitive functions. The SNSB-II evaluates lots of cognitive factors including verbal and visual memory, visuo-constructive function, language, praxis, components of Gerstmann syndrome (acalculia, agraphia, right/left disorientation, finger agnosia), and frontal/executive functions. We chose to use six cognitive measures, which were representative and important neuropsychological tests to evaluate the cognitive function in five cognitive domains as follows: (1) Memory: the Seoul Verbal Learning Test SVLT delayed recall and Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT) delayed recall; (2) Language: Korean version of the Boston Naming Test; (3) Visuospatial function: RCFT copying Test; (4) Frontal executive function: the Stroop Test color reading; and (5) Attention: Digit Span Test backward.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed separately in males and females. We used independent t-tests and chi-squared tests to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of Aβ-positive (Aβ+) and Aβ-negative (Aβ−) groups. To explore the association between BMI and Aβ positivity, we performed a logistic regression analysis with BMI as predictor after controlling for age, APOE4 genotype, and cognitive stage (NC and MCI). To check the correlation among BMI, LASMI, and GFFP, we used Pearson’s correlation with BMI as a dependent variable and LASMI or GFFP as an independent variable. To investigate the association between body composition (muscle and fat mass) in the thighs and Aβ positivity, we performed a logistic regression analysis with LASMI and GFFP together as predictors after controlling for age, APOE4 genotype, and cognitive stage (NC and MCI). To further validate the relationship between Aβ burden and body composition (muscle and fat mass) in the thighs, we explored the relationship using quantified CL values rather than cut-off-based categorization. In this analysis, we used partial correlation with CL values as dependent variables and LASMI or GFFP as independent variables after controlling for age, APOE4 genotype, and cognitive stage (NC and MCI). Finally, to evaluate the effect modification of gender and body composition in the thighs on Aβ positivity, we performed multivariable logistic regression analysis with LASMI, GFFP, and gender together as main effects and LASMI*gender and GFFP*gender as interaction effects after controlling for age and APOE4 genotype in all participants (males and females).

All reported p-values were two-sided, and the significance level was set at 0.05. All analyses were performed using R version 4.3.0 (Institute for Statistics and Mathematics, Vienna, Austria; www.R-project.org).

Results

Clinical characteristics of participants

Among the 240 participants, there were 134 males with a mean age of 71.3±6.7 years and 106 females with a mean age of 69.9±8.1 years (Table 1). There were no differences between males and females in the frequency of Aβ+ (32.8% and 38.7%, p=0.421) (Table 1) and in the frequency of MCI stage (53.7% and 42.5%, p=0.108) (Additional file 1: Table S1). Males (13.7±4.0) had a significantly higher mean years of education than females (12.0±4.8, p=0.002). However, rates of hypertension, diabetes, and APOE4 genotype were not different between males and females. Males (5.57±0.47) had a higher mean LASMI than females (4.64±0.44, p<0.001) and females (25.19±4.54) had a higher mean GFFP than males (18.72±4.05, p<0.001), although mean BMI was not different between gender (p=0.166).

Table 1 Demographic variables and body composition profiles of study participants
Full size table

Effect of BMI on Aβ uptakes

Among males, the Aβ+ group had (22.85±2.41) lower BMI than Aβ- (24.56±2.57, p<0.001). Among females, the Aβ+ group also had (22.69±2.84) lower BMI than Aβ- (24.01±2.91, p=0.024). BMI was also associated with Aβ positivity in both males (OR=0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92) and females (OR=0.82, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.96).

Regarding the relationship of BMI with LASMI and GFFP, among males, BMI was positively correlated with LASMI (r=0.581, p<0.001) and GFFP (r=0.422, p<0.001). Among females, BMI was also correlated with LASMI (r=0.533, p<0.001) and GFFP (r=0.349, p=0.001)

Effects of body composition on Aβ uptakes

As illustrated in Fig. 1, among males, Aβ+ group (17.15±3.66) had lower GFFP than Aβ- (19.48±4.02, p=0.001), while mean LASMI was not different between Aβ+ and Aβ- group (p=0.111). Among females, Aβ+ group (4.72±0.42) had lower LASMI than Aβ- (4.50±0.44, p=0.011), while mean GFFP was not different between Aβ+ and Aβ- group (p=0.803).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Gender differences in muscle and fat mass between Aβ positivity. a Values depicted in the box plot represent LASMI on the Y-axis. b Values depicted in the box plot represent GFFP on the Y-axis. Abbreviations: Aβ, amyloid; OR, odds ratios; LASMI, lower extremity muscle mass; GFFP, gluteofemoral fat percentage

Full size image

Among males, GFFP (OR=0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.95) was independently associated with Aβ positivity, while LASMI (OR=0.49, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.40) was not associated with Aβ positivity (Table 2). In contrast, among females, a higher LAMSI (OR=0.27, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.84) was independently associated with lesser Aβ positivity, while GFFP (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.10) was not associated with Aβ positivity (Table 2). There was no interaction effect of gender with LAMSI (gender*LASMI, p=0.875) and GFFP (gender*GFFP, p=0.092) on Aβ positivity in all participants (Table 2).

Table 2 Aβ positivity based on body composition
Full size table

Figure 2 shows the correlation between LAMSI and CL values. Among males, GFFP (r=−0.253, p=0.004) negatively correlated with CL values, while LASMI (r=−0.042, p=0.636) did not correlate with CL values. In contrast, among females, LAMSI (r=−0.205, p=0.037) negatively correlated with CL values, while GFFP (r=0.022, p=0.827) did not correlate with CL values.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlations between Aβ PET CL values and muscle or fat mass in lower extremities in men and women. a Values depicted in the scatter plot represent LASMI on the X-axis and Aβ PET CL values on the Y-axis. b Values depicted in the scatter plot represent GFFP on the X-axis and Aβ PET CL values on the Y-axis. Abbreviations: Aβ, amyloid; CL, centiloid; LASMI, lower extremity appendicular skeletal muscle mass index. GFFP, gluteofemoral fat percentage

Full size image

Discussion

In the present study, we systematically investigated the effects of muscle and fat mass in the thighs on brain Aβ deposition between males and females in a large cohort. We found that higher muscle mass, as reflected by the LASMI, was associated with a lesser risk of Aβ positivity in females. Higher fat mass, as reflected by the GFFP, was associated with a lesser risk of Aβ positivity in males. Thus, our findings suggest that there may be gender differences in the effects of body composition on Aβ deposition. Furthermore, our results may help in designing strategies for controlling body composition to prevent Aβ deposition.

Our first major finding was that higher muscle mass in the thighs was associated with a lesser risk of Aβ positivity in females. Previous studies have shown that sarcopenia is associated with incident probable AD dementia and cognitive impairment in older adults [35, 36]. However, information on the association between sarcopenia and AD biomarkers is lacking. Several possible mechanisms have been proposed to explain the relationship between muscle mass and brain Aβ positivity. Specifically, this relationship may be explained by the fact that Aβ-mediated neurodegeneration in the hypothalamus is involved in regulating dietary intake and energy expenditure [37], and systemic pro-inflammatory changes [38, 39]. However, we did not observe this relationship in males. To our knowledge, our findings are the first to report the gender-specific deleterious effects of sarcopenia on Aβ deposition. One study showed that sarcopenia only increased all-cause mortality in females [40]. It is important to identify the reason why females are more vulnerable to sarcopenia. Hormonal and socio-behavioral effects may contribute to gender differences. In particular, testosterone and estrogen may play crucial roles. Testosterone possesses anabolic properties, and estrogen modulates and prevents inflammation [41]. A decrease in testosterone level in elderly males and estrogen deficiency in elderly females triggers the discontinuance of anabolic reactions in males and increases inflammatory reactions in females. These characteristics are known to be distinct precipitating factors for sarcopenia in relation to gender [41]. In fact, the Framingham Heart Study found that higher levels of inflammatory proteins, such as interleukin, were associated with sarcopenia in females [42]. Hence, it was expected that sarcopenia in females would be closely associated with inflammation, which might lead to increased Aβ deposition.

Our second major finding was that higher fat mass in the thighs was associated with a lesser risk of Aβ positivity in males. The association of fat mass with Aβ might be explained by the distinct effects of fat on Aβ positivity depending on the fat tissue location. A previous study suggested that males have more abdominal fat than females, whereas females have more fat mass in their thighs than males [14]. Unlike abdominal fat, fat mass in the thighs is known to have beneficial effects on metabolic health, which is closely related to a higher level of adiponectin known as a fat tissue-specific hormone [15]. In fact, it has been reported that there are lower levels of adiponectin in males than in age-and BMI-matched females [43]. Growing evidence indicates that adiponectin possesses anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizing properties [15] and it has a protective role in the development of neurodegenerative diseases [44, 45]. In particular, a recent study revealed that higher levels of adiponectin were associated with higher Aβ levels in the cerebrospinal fluid, which suggested possible neuroprotective effects of adiponectin against Aβ positivity [46]. Thus, it was expected that a reduction in adiponectin levels might be a possible explanation for male-specific vulnerability following a reduction of fat mass in the thighs.

Limitations

The strength of the present study is that we systematically investigated the effects of body composition on Aβ positivity with measurements of muscle and fat mass in the thighs in a large-sized cohort. However, our study has several limitations that should be addressed. First, since this was a cross-sectional study, it was difficult to determine the temporal relationships between the changes in body composition and Aβ deposition. Second, we were not able to assess repeated measurements over time, and then we did not cover the change or variability of muscle and fat mass. Third, we lacked more precise data of thigh muscle and fat mass, because we used LASMI and GFFP as proxy measures for muscle and fat mass in the thighs. However, existing findings show that GFFP highly correlates with actual values of thigh fat mass measured using DXA scans of the whole body [47], and LAMSI correlates with thigh muscle volume measured using MRI scans of the thigh [34]. Fourth, we used muscle and fat mass measured within 3 years before or after the Aβ PET. However, this limitation was alleviated to some extent by previous findings that the annual increase in Aβ is very low [48]. Finally, our participants were recruited from a population undergoing a comprehensive preventive health exam that was not covered by national medical insurance. The cohort was also restricted to participants undergoing DXA testing, which might have differed from the cohort of patients who did not undergo such testing. This study may have thus resulted in the enrollment of a healthier or more “health-seeking” population, which may also limit the generalizability of this study to other populations.

Conclusions

In the present study, we highlight the importance of recognizing that gender differences may exist with respect to how specific body compositions may potentially protect against Aβ deposition. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the detection of changes in thigh muscle and fat mass in relation to gender are needed for early diagnosis and prevention of AD.

Availability of data and materials

Anonymized data for our analyses presented in this report are available upon request from the corresponding authors.

References

  1. Rowe CC, Bourgeat P, Ellis KA, Brown B, Lim YY, Mulligan R, et al. Predicting Alzheimer disease with beta-amyloid imaging: results from the Australian imaging, biomarkers, and lifestyle study of ageing. Ann Neurol. 2013;74:905–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Villemagne VL, Pike KE, Chetelat G, Ellis KA, Mulligan RS, Bourgeat P, et al. Longitudinal assessment of Abeta and cognition in aging and Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:181–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ye BS, Kim HJ, Kim YJ, Jung NY, Lee JS, Lee J, et al. Longitudinal outcomes of amyloid positive versus negative amnestic mild cognitive impairments: a three-year longitudinal study. Sci Rep. 2018;8:5557.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tolppanen AM, Ngandu T, Kåreholt I, Laatikainen T, Rusanen M, Soininen H, et al. Midlife and late-life body mass index and late-life dementia: results from a prospective population-based cohort. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;38:201–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell SP, Liu D, Samuels LR, Shah AS, Gifford KA, Hohman TJ, et al. Late-Life Body Mass Index, Rapid Weight Loss, Apolipoprotein E ε4 and the Risk of Cognitive Decline and Incident Dementia. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21:1259–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson DK, Wilkins CH, Morris JC. Accelerated weight loss may precede diagnosis in Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1312–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vidoni ED, Townley RA, Honea RA, Burns JM. Alzheimer disease biomarkers are associated with body mass index. Neurology. 2011;77:1913–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang SH, Kim JH, Chang Y, Cheon BK, Choe YS, Jang H, et al. Independent effect of body mass index variation on amyloid-β positivity. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:924550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim YH, So WY. Relative lower body circumferences are associated with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and arterial stiffness. Technol Health Care. 2017;25:211–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen CL, Liu L, Huang JY, Yu YL, Shen G, Lo K, et al. Thigh Circumference and Risk of All-Cause, Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Mortality: A Cohort Study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13:1977–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel P, Abate N. Body fat distribution and insulin resistance. Nutrients. 2013;5:2019–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Abe T, Kawakami Y, Kondo M, Fukunaga T. Comparison of ultrasound-measured age-related, site-specific muscle loss between healthy Japanese and German men. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2011;31:320–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yim JE, Heshka S, Albu JB, Heymsfield S, Gallagher D. Femoral-gluteal subcutaneous and intermuscular adipose tissues have independent and opposing relationships with CVD risk. J Appl Physiol. 1985;2008(104):700–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schorr M, Dichtel LE, Gerweck AV, Valera RD, Torriani M, Miller KK, et al. Sex differences in body composition and association with cardiometabolic risk. Biol Sex Differ. 2018;9:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Turer AT, Khera A, Ayers CR, Turer CB, Grundy SM, Vega GL, et al. Adipose tissue mass and location affect circulating adiponectin levels. Diabetologia. 2011;54:2515–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Vega GL, Adams-Huet B, Peshock R, Willett D, Shah B, Grundy SM. Influence of body fat content and distribution on variation in metabolic risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4459–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grundy SM, Adams-Huet B, Vega GL. Variable contributions of fat content and distribution to metabolic syndrome risk factors. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2008;6:281–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Khera A, Vega GL, Das SR, Ayers C, McGuire DK, Grundy SM, et al. Sex differences in the relationship between C-reactive protein and body fat. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:3251–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Okura T, Nakata Y, Yamabuki K, Tanaka K. Regional body composition changes exhibit opposing effects on coronary heart disease risk factors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:923–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Snijder MB, Zimmet PZ, Visser M, Dekker JM, Seidell JC, Shaw JE. Independent and opposite associations of waist and hip circumferences with diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia: the AusDiab Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:402–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morley JE, Baumgartner RN, Roubenoff R, Mayer J, Nair KS. Sarcopenia. J Lab Clin Med. 2001;137:231–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tyrovolas S, Panagiotakos D, Georgousopoulou E, Chrysohoou C, Tousoulis D, Haro JM, et al. Skeletal muscle mass in relation to 10 year cardiovascular disease incidence among middle aged and older adults: the ATTICA study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020;74:26–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Celis-Morales CA, Welsh P, Lyall DM, Steell L, Petermann F, Anderson J, et al. Associations of grip strength with cardiovascular, respiratory, and cancer outcomes and all cause mortality: prospective cohort study of half a million UK Biobank participants. BMJ. 2018;361:k1651.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Abellan van Kan G. Epidemiology and consequences of sarcopenia. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13:708–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peterson SJ, Braunschweig CA. Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Associated Outcomes in the Clinical Setting. Nutr Clin Pract. 2016;31:40–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kang SH, Park YH, Lee D, Kim JP, Chin J, Ahn Y, et al. The Cortical Neuroanatomy Related to Specific Neuropsychological Deficits in Alzheimer's Continuum. Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2019;18:77–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kang Y, Jahng S, Na DL. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery. 2nd ed. Seoul: Human Brain Research & Consulting Co.; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Christensen KJ, Multhaup KS, Nordstrom S, Voss K. A cognitive battery for dementia: Development and measurement characteristics. Psychol Assess J Consul Clin Psychol. 1991;3:168–74.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Petersen RC. Clinical practice. Mild cognitive impairment. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2227–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jeong HJ, Lee H, Lee S-Y, Seo S, Park KH, Lee Y-B, et al. [18F]THK5351 PET Imaging in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Clin Neurol. 2020;16:202–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cho SH, Choe YS, Kim HJ, Jang H, Kim Y, Kim SE, et al. A new Centiloid method for (18)F-florbetaben and (18)F-flutemetamol PET without conversion to PiB. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:1938–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Villeneuve S, Rabinovici GD, Cohn-Sheehy BI, Madison C, Ayakta N, Ghosh PM, et al. Existing Pittsburgh Compound-B positron emission tomography thresholds are too high: statistical and pathological evaluation. Brain. 2015;138:2020–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim JH, Choi SH, Lim S, Kim KW, Lim JY, Cho NH, et al. Assessment of appendicular skeletal muscle mass by bioimpedance in older community-dwelling Korean adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;58:303–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hosono O, Yoshikawa N, Shimizu N, Kiryu S, Uehara M, Kobayashi H, et al. Quantitative analysis of skeletal muscle mass in patients with rheumatic diseases under glucocorticoid therapy--comparison among bioelectrical impedance analysis, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25:257–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Burns JM, Johnson DK, Watts A, Swerdlow RH, Brooks WM. Reduced lean mass in early Alzheimer disease and its association with brain atrophy. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:428–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Boyle PA, Buchman AS, Wilson RS, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA. Association of muscle strength with the risk of Alzheimer disease and the rate of cognitive decline in community-dwelling older persons. Arch Neurol. 2009;66:1339–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Loskutova N, Honea RA, Brooks WM, Burns JM. Reduced limbic and hypothalamic volumes correlate with bone density in early Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20:313–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Yaffe K, Kanaya A, Lindquist K, Simonsick EM, Harris T, Shorr RI, et al. The metabolic syndrome, inflammation, and risk of cognitive decline. JAMA. 2004;292:2237–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Krabbe KS, Pedersen M, Bruunsgaard H. Inflammatory mediators in the elderly. Exp Gerontol. 2004;39:687–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Batsis JA, Mackenzie TA, Barre LK, Lopez-Jimenez F, Bartels SJ. Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and mortality in older adults: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68:1001–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Anderson LJ, Liu H, Garcia JM. Sex Differences in Muscle Wasting. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1043:153–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Payette H, Roubenoff R, Jacques PF, Dinarello CA, Wilson PW, Abad LW, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 and interleukin 6 predict sarcopenia in very old community-living men and women: the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1237–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hausman DB, DiGirolamo M, Bartness TJ, Hausman GJ, Martin RJ. The biology of white adipocyte proliferation. Obes Rev. 2001;2:239–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kamogawa K, Kohara K, Tabara Y, Uetani E, Nagai T, Yamamoto M, et al. Abdominal fat, adipose-derived hormones and mild cognitive impairment: the J-SHIPP study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;30:432–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gorska-Ciebiada M, Saryusz-Wolska M, Borkowska A, Ciebiada M, Loba J. Adiponectin, leptin and IL-1 beta in elderly diabetic patients with mild cognitive impairment. Metab Brain Dis. 2016;31:257–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Waragai M, Adame A, Trinh I, Sekiyama K, Takamatsu Y, Une K, et al. Possible Involvement of Adiponectin, the Anti-Diabetes Molecule, in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;52:1453–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Leslie WD. Prediction of body composition from spine and hip bone densitometry. J Clin Densitom. 2009;12:428–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kemppainen NM, Scheinin NM, Koivunen J, Johansson J, Toivonen JT, Någren K, et al. Five-year follow-up of 11C-PIB uptake in Alzheimer's disease and MCI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:283–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant of the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI19C1132); a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare and Ministry of science and ICT, Republic of Korea (grant number: HU20C0111, HU22C0170); the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT)(NRF-2019R1A5A2027340); Institute of Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP)grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (No.2021-0-02068, Artificial Intelligence Innovation Hub); Future Medicine 20*30 Project of the Samsung Medical Center [#SMX1220021]; the "National Institute of Health" research project (2021-ER1006-01); Korea University Guro Hospital (KOREA RESEARCH-DRIVEN HOSPITAL) and grant funded by Korea University Medicine (K2210201); and Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (grant number: 2022R1I1A1A01056956).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Sung Hoon Kang, Yeong Sim Choe, Jun Pyo Kim, Hyemin Jang, Hee Jin Kim, Duk L. Na & Sang Won Seo

  2. Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Sung Hoon Kang & Seong-Beom Koh

  3. Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea

    Kyung Hyun Lee, Sang Won Seo & Mira Kang

  4. Center for Cohort Studies, Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Yoosoo Chang

  5. Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea

    Yeong Sim Choe & Sang Won Seo

  6. Center for Health Promotion, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Hee Young Shin & Mira Kang

  7. Alzheimer’s Disease Convergence Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

    Sang Won Seo

  8. Department of Intelligent Precision Healthcare Convergence, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea

    Sang Won Seo

  9. Digital Innovation Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Mira Kang

Authors
  1. Sung Hoon Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kyung Hyun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoosoo Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yeong Sim Choe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jun Pyo Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hyemin Jang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hee Young Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hee Jin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Seong-Beom Koh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Duk L. Na
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Sang Won Seo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mira Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.H. Kang, S.W. Seo, and M. Kang contributed to the study conception and design. S.H. K.H. Lee, Y.S. Choe, J.P. Kim, H. Jang, H.Y. Shin, H.J. Kim, S. Koh, D.L. Na, S.W. Seo, and M. Kang contributed data collection. S.H. Kang performed the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. S.H. Kang, Y. Chang, S.W. Seo, and M. Kang contributed interpretation of data and manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sang Won Seo or Mira Kang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Samsung Medical Centre. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and caregivers

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Demographic variables of study participants stratified by cognitive stage.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, S.H., Lee, K.H., Chang, Y. et al. Gender-specific relationship between thigh muscle and fat mass and brain amyloid-β positivity. Alz Res Therapy 14, 145 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13195-022-01086-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13195-022-01086-5

Keywords

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1758-9193