Skip to main content

Table 2 Associations between β-amyloid burden and cognition in cognitively normal individuals

From: Amyloid imaging and memory change for prediction of cognitive impairment

Study

Year

Radiotracer

Samplea

Number of subjectsa

Mean age (SD)

Method

Associations between amyloid imaging and cognitive function

Cross-sectional measures of concurrent β-amyloid load and cognition

Rowe et al. [7]

2010

PiB

CN

177

71.6 (7.4)

SUVR

No association with long delay verbal recall (CVLT) No difference in long delay verbal recall between those with high versus low PiB binding

Rentz et al. [33]

2010

PiB

CN

66

73.9 (8.1)

DVR

No main effect of precuneus PiB on cognitive function Higher precuneus PiB associated with lower cued (but not free recall) and canonical variate score in CN individuals with low but not high cognitive reserve measured by AMNART

Storandt et al. [42]

2009

PiB

CN

135

PiB- 74.3 (6.2)

Pib+ 75.4 (6.3)

BP

No association with global, verbal, spatial, or working memory composites or individual cognitive measures

Braskie et al. [39]

2010

[18F]FDDNP

CN

10

73 (10.4)

DVR

Higher [18F]FDDNP in right frontal and some parietal areas associated with lower composite cognitive score

Mormino et al. [41]

2009

PiB

CNb

20

72.3 (6.0)

SUVR, DVR

Higher PiB associated with lower episodic memory composite score (P < 0.01)

Mormino et al. [41]

2009

PiB

CNc

17

78.5 (5.4)

SUVR, DVR

No associations with episodic memory composite score

Rowe et al. [28]

2007

PiB

CN

27

72.6 (6.9)

DVR

No difference in cognitive performance between PiB-positive and PiB-negative

Pike et al. [35]

2007

PiB

CN

32

71.7 (6.6)

SUVR

Higher PiB associated with lower episodic memory composite score (r = -0.38, P < 0.05) PiB-positive compared with PiB-negative had lower episodic memory composite score (P < 0.05)

Cross-sectional measures of β-amyloid load and longitudinal measures of cognition

Resnick et al. [6]

2010

PiB

CN

57

(6 CDR = 0.5)

78.8 (6.2)

DVR

Higher PiB associated with greater decline in immediate and delayed verbal recall and MMSE (all P ≤ 0.01) but not visual memory

Associations most pronounced for frontal and lateral temporal cortex, as well as putamen

Storandt et al. [42]

2009

PiB

CN

135

PiB- 74.3 (6.2)

Pib+ 75.4 (6.3)

BP

Higher PiB associated with greater decline in working memory and visuospatial ability

Villemagne et al. [43]

2008

PiB

Stable (S), declining (D)

24 S, 10 D

S 71.7 (6.7)

D 75.5 (4.4)

SUVR

Higher PiB associated with greater decline in word-list recall (r = -0.78) in decliners only

  1. aIn some cases a study subsample. bBerkeley Aging Study. cAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. AMNART, American National Adult Reading Test; BP, binding potential; CDR, Clinical Dementia Rating scale; CN, cognitively normal; CVLT, California Verbal Learning Test; DVR, distribution volume ratio; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; PiB, [11C]Pittsburgh Compound-B; RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; SD, standard deviation; SUVR, standard uptake value ratio.